Version 1 – Social Referrals infographic

May 8

Ver­sion 1, a con­sul­tancy and man­aged ser­vices firm has been using our Social Refer­rals soft­ware to find new staff. They have described Zartis as ‘game-changing’ in a recent Irish Times arti­cle, which you can read on The Irish Times web­site. Below is a lovely info­graphic of how suc­cess­ful Social Refer­rals has been for them.

Referral madness

Apr 13

We’re see­ing a lot of inter­est­ing angles on employee refer­rals over the past cou­ple of months. The lat­est is a job seeker offer­ing $600 on Craigslist to any­body who gets them a job in their company.

They specif­i­cally want to work in sales/biz dev in a pub­lic com­pany in LA County. I can’t fig­ure out if this is a good thing or not. Is this brib­ing your way into a com­pany or a stroke of genius?

The essential history of recruitment

Apr 13

Zartis social recruiting history

Recruitment agencies: how not to approach a company

Apr 5


We’re a small soft­ware com­pany help­ing peo­ple recruit new employ­ees through social media and employee referrals.

Today, we received an unso­licited email from a large recruit­ment agency that “spe­cialise in work­ing with start up companies.”

Strangely the email goes on to say that “our stan­dard terms and con­di­tions are auto­mat­i­cally attached to every email we send.” It sounds like an apol­ogy for some kind of IT prob­lem they’re hav­ing. But thank­fully the T&Cs are being reviewed “in light of the cur­rent mar­ket con­di­tions”, what­ever that means.

The first line of the T&Cs tells me to read them care­fully as they are bind­ing on me. Remem­ber this is an unso­licited email. It is the company’s pol­icy to “strictly enforce its terms of agree­ment in the event of any dis­pute.” And we haven’t even spo­ken yet.

The fee struc­ture of the agency is really inter­est­ing. If we hire some­body through them that earns €20,000 we pay them €7,500 . That goes up to €17,500 for some­body on €50,000. Remem­ber these guys spe­cialise in start ups!

I can’t think of any other indus­try that oper­ates with these kind of eco­nom­ics. I also can’t think of another sec­tor where you’d send some­body an unso­licited email with aggres­sive terms and con­di­tions con­tain­ing an out­line of penal­ties and threats of legal action. It makes the Niger­ian email scams seem polite.

Maybe it’s time employ­ers gave new employ­ees that don’t come through an agency a sign on bonus for approach­ing them directly.

Employee referrals in small companies

Mar 29

Most small com­pa­nies don’t have a for­mal employee refer­ral pro­gram. Every­body knows every­body so what’s the point, right?

We’re one of those small com­pa­nies. We just ran a refer­ral cam­paign to find a new intern for a media pro­duc­tion role. Here’s how it panned out:

I added the job into our social refer­ral soft­ware on Sat­ur­day evening.
Each of our 5 per­son team got an auto gen­er­ated email inform­ing them about the posi­tion.
I offered an Apple TV as a reward for a suc­cess­ful hire.
Each employee logged in and was able to eas­ily post the posi­tion through Zartis to their social graph.
On Mon­day morn­ing we had 9 can­di­dates for the posi­tion.
We can track each refer­ral back to each employee. We also cap­ture the social net­work each job seeker came from.

The sources of traf­fic to the job ad were:

961 Twit­ter
93 Face­book
70 LinkedIn

Cou­ple of points to con­sider. The num­ber of Twit­ter views is inflated because the num­ber of “bots” that find the link and land on the page. Even if half of all views were cre­ated by bots it’s still a lot of real peo­ple com­ing through. There were about 34 retweets of the job ad. They were defi­nately real people.

LinkedIn was rel­a­tively low but the posi­tion is for an intern. LinkedIn would prob­a­bly yield a bet­ter crop if it was a more senior posi­tion. Face­book did ok in terms of dri­ving traf­fic but it did drive a lot of “engage­ment” with peo­ple com­ment­ing on the posi­tion and the post.

Did it work? Absolutely. We got 9 great can­di­dates in two days. And, this is for a 5 per­son com­pany. It was also great for employer brand­ing. I’m look­ing for­ward to see­ing the results for a 300 per­son com­pany in a cou­ple of weeks.

Online and social recruiting checklist

Feb 29


Some­times it’s hard to see the wood from the trees. You get bom­barded with so much info it’s some­times hard to do an objec­tive self appraisal.

So we’re try­ing to help by offer­ing you a free and con­fi­den­tial review of your online and social media recruit­ing. If you’re inter­ested we’ll do the following:

  • Review your web site for usabil­ity issues and let you know how it scores
  • Review the can­di­date expe­ri­ence and give you point­ers on how you could improve it
  • Review your social recruit­ing and give you feedback

This is a ser­vice for CEOs, COOs, HR depart­ments and inter­nal recruiters. There are no catches and no strings attached. We’ll also release bench­mark­ing infor­ma­tion on how you score against other com­pa­nies in your category.

To get started sim­ply signup here. We love for­ward to hear­ing from you.

Do paid ads in social media deliver candidates?

Feb 28


We’ve an ongo­ing debate in the office about how effec­tive ads in social net­works are for recruit­ment.
The atti­tudes run some­thing like this:

You’re in LinkedIn and prob­a­bly think­ing about your career so it’s a good time and place to get someone’s attention.”

I’ve never clicked on one of those ads.”

The jobs dis­played in LinkedIn def­i­nitely get your attention.”

As the say­ing goes: “I know half of my adver­tis­ing bud­get is wasted, but I’m not sure which half”. Pay per click helps answer that, so we ran a sim­ple test.

We cre­ated a Face­book ad for a free­lance writer. After seg­ment­ing the audi­ence by geog­ra­phy and demo­graph­ics there were about 20,000 peo­ple in our tar­get audience.

Because I’m writ­ing this you can prob­a­bly guess that we didn’t find our writer.

We cre­ated two vari­ants of the same ad as a sim­ple A/B test. The ad was seen by about 4,000 peo­ple, on aver­age 5 times in one week. Four peo­ple in total clicked through. None applied for the job. Maybe I write lousy ad copy. It was pretty dis­ap­point­ing. We know Face­book can work extremely well for job refer­rals. You can read a quirky case study here.

Total cost of exper­i­ment $1.60. Teacher’s com­ment: “Needs more practice.”

We ran a test on LinkedIn yes­ter­day. This time for a mobile app devel­oper in a friend’s com­pany. The job had already been tweeted by some high-Klout indi­vid­u­als. There were about 200 page views gen­er­ated from the twit­ter traf­fic. But no appli­cants. Hen’s teeth and mobile app developers…

Based on the very gran­u­lar seg­men­ta­tion offered by LinkedIn, we set our ad to a tar­get of 26,853 peo­ple. Two vari­ants were cre­ated for A/B test­ing. In one day there were 17,189 impres­sions and 4 click throughs result­ing in one applicant.

Total cost of exper­i­ment so far $11.03.

What does this tell us? Not a huge amount sadly because our R&D bud­get is so low. The laws of small num­bers are dangerous.

If we stretched the num­bers and spent $1103, buy­ing 400 LinkedIn click throughs, would we have got 100 appli­cants? That could poten­tially be very powerful.

If you’re read­ing this with £10k burn­ing a hole in your pocket let me know and we can find which half is not wasted.

PS: if you’re a mobile app devel­oper check out the mobile devel­oper role here.

Employees and social referrals

Feb 21

We’re build­ing an employee refer­ral fea­ture into Zartis. We’re strug­gling with the mar­ket­ing mes­sage. “Unlock­ing the poten­tial of your employ­ees’ social graph” might be a true state­ment but it doesn’t sound great, does it? “Lever­ag­ing your net­work to har­ness the poten­tial.…” I can’t go on.….

So, some­body in here came up with “instant refer­rals, just add jobs”. We like it. We hope you’ll like the prod­uct. We’re already work­ing with a cou­ple of our early customers.

If you’d like to increase the num­ber of refer­ral hires at your com­pany let us know.

Mobile recruiting made easy

Jan 6


We’ve just made all of our client job sites mobile friendly. Why bother you might ask?

5% of all traf­fic to our clients’ job pages is already from mobile devices. That num­ber would have been under 1% two years ago. That’s fast growth. Expect it to con­tinue. Some­thing like 750,000 smart phones are being acti­vated every day!

Twit­ter is also hav­ing a huge impact on mobile recruit­ing. Over 50% of all Twit­ter traf­fic is now from mobile. We see a huge suc­cess rate from our clients post­ing jobs on Twit­ter. Noth­ing worse than click­ing on a job tweet with a mobile device and you can’t even see the con­tent of the page properly.

With most careers sites when a can­di­date lands on a page, they find that way the mobile browser ren­ders the con­tent really sucks. Turn­ing your iPhone on its side doesn’t help. You still can’t upload a CV/Resume. Few would argue that the process works. It’s bad employer brand­ing. Period.

On our mobile-friendly pages we’ve trimmed down the con­tent dis­played to just the job descrip­tion and require­ments. If a can­di­date applies from their mobile they send their name, email, cur­rent job title and com­pany. Tada! Their details are now in your sys­tem. If it’s the CTO of Google you can call him back. Great.

The can­di­date also gets an email sent to them with a link to com­plete their appli­ca­tion once they are back at a desktop/laptop. This is obvi­ously what you’d hope they do but at least you’ve cap­tured their con­tact details and iden­tify from the mobile interaction.

Of course they can always use their LinkedIn pro­file from a mobile if they’re on a Zartis devel­oped careers site.

Happy mobile recruiting.

New year, new job

Jan 4


Despite the wheels of com­merce grind­ing to a halt over Christ­mas, vis­its to our clients’ job pages still aver­aged 50% of their usual daily traf­fic on 24th, 25th, 31st Dec, and 1st Jan. Each of these days was on a Sat­ur­day or a Sun­day. On a nor­mal week­end vis­its to job ads are often down by up to 50%. So sta­tis­ti­cally, Christ­mas and New Year’s didn’t really have any impact on job search.

What did have an impact is the new year. New Year’s res­o­lu­tions must have included ditch­ing the boss. Yes­ter­day was our busiest day for job views by a long shot. Sure, we’re grow­ing fast which cre­ates some dis­tor­tion, but yes­ter­day was over twice as busy as an aver­age day in December.

To those of you think­ing of hir­ing, now’s a good time to set out your stall.